I’ve been continuing to re-read Burgert’s book, The Calligraphic Line. At the beginning, he writes that calligraphy is two-dimensional design using a limited set of symbols with a limiting set of rules. He discusses the spectrum of legibility -> abstract 2D design, and the concomitant spectrum of typography -> fine art. (Or something like that; I don’t have the book in front of me.)
Burgert provides a hittite heiroglyphics image as an illustration to go with his discussion of the leap from flowing oral language to written symbols. After reading this, I constructed an alphabet using elements of that hittite image. It was handy; another image could have done as well. This is the alphabet:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/272c0/272c0e9a288405baa0c9e36e561ee0a27c87a493" alt="2015-01-16 formal alphabet"
Using this alphabet, I wrote out a quotation following standard rules of typography, writing left to right in horizontal lines, paying attention to kerning, and so on.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/795ae/795aed170a2e43e363e95a26eaf1abc776a807d0" alt="2015-01-16-formal-alphabet-whence-did"
It was interesting, but I wanted to push it further to abstract two-dimensional design. After one falst start, this was the next step:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24f97/24f97b538c15ef5c27b545e441334a406f12c5cd" alt="2015-01-16-formal-alphabet-whence-did-2"
I thought it was interesting. And then pushed it further along the abstraction spectrum:
, but was surprised at how little I had moved along the typography/abstraction spectrum between lettering 2 and lettering 3. So far, it’s fairly easy, so I probably haven’t gone far enough yet.
Like this:
Like Loading...